On Boxes and Arrows, Andres Zapata gives a helpful tutorial on turning wireframe designs into dimensional narratives - communicating quickly, clearly and cheaply, the intended interaction conventions and patterns.

Five eye-tracking experiments conducted on 5 sites, over 5 days. Etre have (rather helpfully) released the findings for their tests on the Dixons, Currys, Amazon, Marks & Spencer and HMV sites.

It was interesting to read how Amazon exploit their awareness of the page's hotspots to market offers and services more effectively than many of their competitors.

Well nearly - Apple have officially released beta software (Boot Camp) to let you install XP on Intel based macs. Not that you couldn't do it already, but an official Apple solution is going to be a whole lot more reassuring to the majority of consumers and becomes (IMHO) another incentive to invest in an Apple product.

I couldn't help but be amused by their riff on the Windows Logo, and some of the none too subtle critiques of the whole Windows experience; for example: "EFI and BIOS - Macs use an ultra-modern industry standard technology called EFI to handle booting. Sadly, Windows XP, and even the upcoming Vista, are stuck in the 1980s with old-fashioned BIOS. But with Boot Camp, the Mac can operate smoothly in both centuries."

A very interesting debate on Tech Nation between Baroness Susan Greenfield and Ray Kurzweil.

I won't even attempt to do it justice. But, if you have any interest in technology affording us longer, fulfilling lives, and of the philosophical questions that arise as a consequence, I urge you to listen to it.

In retort to Ray's articulate argument, that exponential growth in the tech sector will enable us to overcome seemingly insurmountable obstacles posed by nature, Susan Greenfield used a quote: "You're not thinking, you're being logical."

I liked this. It's all too easy to be gain confidence from the existence of a predicted trajectory. Her assertion, that gathering data in increasing amounts, and being able to process it is only half the problem, was followed up by another observation: "We're answer rich, but question poor."

She was referring to Neuroscience, but to me, the observation has an uncanny parallel to the environment being capitalised on by Web 2.0 services.

As we struggle increasingly with data overload, search engines provide answers only to posed questions, RSS readers only alert you to content that you have sought out, do we actually need help in understanding what the pertinent questions are?